On the other hand, despite its simplicity, STWAVE produced good results and is considerably faster than the other two. Both MIKE 21 SW and SWAN are complex models and have a large set of formulations and parameter choices. The results show a similar behavior among the models and they are statistically comparable. Information about the model performance for different forcing conditions and area types (bay, port, and straight shoreline) is provided. The sensitivity of MIKE 21 SW to some input parameters and physical processes such as wind, tide, and nonlinear interactions is also verified. default folder for tidal constituents (e.g. The models' results are compared through the wave's parameters, namely the significant wave height ( Hs), peak period ( Tp), and mean wave direction (Dir). MIKE 21 Global Tide model - data for tidal prediction of water levels. In situ measurements from buoys and acoustic Doppler current profilers were used to validate the model outputs. The input parameters for the models were obtained from offshore buoys. Several target areas in the Portuguese coast were considered: Obidos Bay and Figueira da Foz, both located in the central part of the continental Portuguese coast Leixões Harbor, located in the north coast and Sines Harbor, located in the west coast, south of Lisbon.

Godins second book, simply called Tides (1988). The MIKE 21 BW results are now obtained with the purpose of comparing them with the previous two. the basis for the analysis and predictions programs used in Canada written by Mike Foreman. The SWAN and STWAVE results were obtained from a previous study that compared their performance. In the present study, the third-generation spectral wave models MIKE 21 BW, SWAN, and STWAVE are compared for the simulation of wave characteristics in shallow waters. Comparing the performance of spectral wave model for coastal areas. Gonçalves, M., and Guedes Soares, C., 2017.

Tidal currents software called mike 21